Home » Independent Blogs » Public Safety » Sacramento » Currently Reading:

Sacramento Fire Department, Why No Volunteers?

June 9, 2009 Independent Blogs, Public Safety, Sacramento 4 Comments

station30closedsmLike many jurisdictions the City of Sacramento is having budget problems. Public safety is under pressure. The City is already browning out fire stations (scheduled temporary closures) and threatening to layoff Firefighters. The Firefighter’s Union is negotiating with the city to avoid the layoffs.

No one wants the reduction in public safety that the closure of stations and layoff of firefighters represents. It is a fearful thought that the Fire Department might not be able to respond quickly enough to an emergency if the City goes through with layoffs.

It certainly begs the question; has the City considered the use of volunteer fire fighters? In the traditional sense of a citizen with a pager who shows up at a fire when paged, no, but there is a reserve program.

reservewebpageThe Reserve traces its history back to 1953 when it began as the Sacramento Fire Auxiliary for Civil Defense. Headquartered today at Station 70 (1910 Arica Way), the 50-member Reserve unit operates a class A structure pumper, a heavy rescue/overhaul squad vehicle, and a commissary unit. The Reserve is dispatched to multiple alarm fires, Level 3 Haz-Mat incidents and other emergencies whenever additional resources are required. The Reserve provides supplemental staffing, food, drinks, and EMS standby at the scene of emergencies, They also have a direct role in decontamination at Hazardous Materials incidents. -source Sac Fire Website

So why not volunteers in the traditional sense? If Firefighters are laid-off and Fire Stations are browned out, maybe citizen firefighters could operate the equipment? Capt. Jim Doucette, 29 year veteran and Public Information Officer for the Sacramento Fire Department had this to say about volunteers:

The department is not against volunteers in principle but the Fire Service has changed so much over the years and there are so many other jobs Firefighters do other than fighting fires,  the 18 weeks of training and continuing education required, it isn’t practical for volunteers. Plus the sheer number of calls they run, he believes it would be hard to find people who would respond on a 24/7 basis. There is a volunteer fire house in the City, old Station 9 on Florin-Perkins Road operated by reserve Firefighters that are not paid. They do not respond to calls on their own, they supplement greater alarm fires.

Chris Harvey, the Sacramento Fire Fighter’s Union PIO had this to say:

The majority of Firefighters in the US are volunteers, mostly rural, urban areas have reserves. The Union is not against adding more Reserve Firefighters, anyone can sign up to be a Reserve. They don’t reach the level of training and certifications that full time permanent Firefighters must have for haz mat, swift water rescue, confined space rescue, high rise buildings, paramedic etc. Plus the background investigations for past criminal behavior and credit problems disqualify many candidates. It isn’t the average guy off the street. We’re not against more reserves and anyone can sign up.

They both expressed that Reserves are one thing but the level of training required to be a Firefighter in a high call volume urban department like Sacramento is not practical for volunteers. But volunteers can and do fight fires in many areas in the country. They respond when called, operate the equipment and fight the fires. Why shouldn’t the City of Sacramento increase its reliance on this proven resource?

Here are some interesting statistics concerning the use of volunteer fire fighters in the US taken from the National Volunteer Fire Council Website;

  • Nearly 8 of every 10 firefighters is a volunteer
  • Volunteers, if paid, would cost taxpayers an estimated $37 billion per year
  • 75% of the 31,000 fire departments are all volunteer
  • 807,900 volunteer firefighters in the U.S.
  • Serve urban, suburban, rural areas

Figures taken from NFPA US Fire Dept. Profile Through1991, NASF Rural Fire Protection in America, 1993

Sacramento already uses Reserve Firefighters, why not expand the program to neighborhood Fire Stations with localized volunteers who can be called out to help? Increased use of volunteers in Sacramento could mitigate browned out fire stations and help bridge the budget gap until the economy improves and the City can afford adequate staffing levels. It would be worth the City’s time to find out how many citizens would be willing to sign up on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis.

That being said Firefighters are heros that dedicate themselves to the protection of our lives and property. Not one paid firefighter should lose their job. But the unfortunate reality of the situation we find ourselves in calls out for a creative solution.

Written By SactoDan | Email this author | All posts by SactoDan

Find this post interesting? Subscribe to our RSS Feed and stay up to date!

©2008-2009 National Republicrat. All Rights Reserved.

Currently there are "4 comments" on this Article:

  1. Mike Reynolds says:

    Why is it that I have not heard of this? This is an excellent idea. I am going to email the city officials. We are wasting money!

    I live in South Sac and we could use volunteers.

  2. JamesD says:

    Thanks for the useful info. It’s so interesting

  3. Mwalter says:

    While having volunteer firefighters sounds like a good idea, there area several things that people need to realize. When you call 911 for the fire deparment in the city you get a firefighter at your door in about 5 minutes on average. If you have volunteers they will have to paged from where ever they are, respond to the staion in their own vehicles ( no red lights or sirens on those) make sure they know where they are goig ,and then get into a fire vehicle and go to your house. That could be a long time to wait. That is just what people in rural areas and towns that are stafed with voulunteers deal with. They feel it in their wallets too, because all fire departents have a rating that insurance companies use to set fire insurance rates. One of the factors used for the rating is how it is staffed. There are other issues that are important but I just wanted people to think about what level of service you want. We live in the capital city of the richest state in the richest country that has ever been. This city needs and deserves a professional fire service. Like it has now.

  4. SactoDan says:

    Mwaiter,

    You make some good points.

    You might not get a firefighter at your door in 5 minutes if the nearest station(s) are closed either.

    I will restate that the intent of the idea is to reduce the effect of browned out stations by supplementing the full time firefighters, not replace them.

    There is no reason a volunteer would have to go to the station first. It is reasonable for them to carry their gear and respond directly to the location of an incident.

Comment on this Article:







Socialize With Us

   

Recent Video

YouTube Preview Image

Tag Cloud

Categories

Archives

Sponsers

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

Blogs

Did Meg Whitman Bail Out on Prop 23 and the Border issue?

August 9, 2010

I wrote a blog the other day. I am afraid that Whitman is doing two things – veering to the left like Arnold did, but because she is either taking the Right for granted or does not care about them.
Many of us have been starved for real substance out of Whitman and what we have [...]

CA-Sen Update: Tom Campbell forgot one key detail while citing polling data…

June 1, 2010

How many of you got Tom Campbell’s letter on Friday asking for money? (Auburn-Placer Recology picked it up today)
I got the following email from Tom Campbell – it told me two things. One is that he is broke and two is that he forgot about the prupose of next Tuesday…
I don’t have personal millions like [...]

California Lt Governor Update – Abel Maldonado Voted to Regulate Clorox

May 31, 2010

Do you like Formula 409? Simple Green?
Clorox? CLR? Windex?
The state Legislature is bought as much by the enviros as they are by the Labor Unions. When the enviros come screaming about a new boogieman – the legislature springs in to action with a new regulation.
Enter Abel Maldonado.
AB1879 – creates a new commission to regulate household [...]

CA-19 / CA LT Governor Update: Jeff Denham + Abel Maldonado = MORE WELFARE!

May 28, 2010

Depending on who you read in 2008 – the state was 10-20 Billion in the hole.
Who cares, right? Time to hand out more candy. Time for more benefits.
Jeff Denham and Abel Maldonado know how to buy votes…
They wanted to extend unemployment benefits even with the state being groosly in the hole.
AB1107 (2008) – the idea [...]

CA Lt Governor Update: Gun Owners Of California Endorse Sam Aanestad

May 26, 2010

The Second Major Gun Rights Group In California has Spoken:
Gun Owners of California Campaign Committee Endorses Senator Sam Aanestad for Lieutenant Governor
SACRAMENTO, CA :  Gun Owners of California Campaign Committee announced its endorsement of Senator Sam Aanestad for Lieutenant Governor today, citing his strong support for the Second Amendment as opposed [...]

Sam Aanestad for Lt Governor Update: NRA Endorsement

May 26, 2010

Given that Abel Maldonado has voted for several pieces of Gun-Control legislation that only Tom Campbell could appreciate on the Republican Side – you had to figure this was coming.
National Rifle Association Endorses
Sam Aanestad for Lieutenant Governor
SACRAMENTO, CA :  Senator Sam Aanestad, Republican candidate for Lt. Governor, announces the [...]

CA Lt Governor Update – Abel Maldonado Voted For Early Release of Prisoners

May 26, 2010

AB1053 (2009) – Written by Jose Solorio (who is a proponent of open borders and alternative sentencing)…
This provides for the early release of Prisoners who are wards of the Division of Juvenile Justice. They are to be released 90-120 days prior to turning 21 or 25 (depending on the crime).
Those that supported this disaster say [...]

CA-19 Update: Look at All the Union Money to Jeff Denham!

May 26, 2010

Jeff Denham is a Fraud. Looks Pretty on the Outside until you unwrap the package and what’s inside… oh mama.
As a State Senator he voted for some awful legislation and was basically the twin of uber-liberal “Republican” Abel Maldonado.
What was Denham’s motivation to be that way?
Follow the Money. Ever wondered why Jeff Denham [...]

CA Lt Governor Update: Sam Aanestad Endorsed by Silicon Valley Association of Republican Women

May 20, 2010

Silicon Valley Association of Republican Women Endorse Sam Aanestad for Lt. Governor
SACRAMENTO, CA : The Silicon Valley Association of Republican Women voted unanimously to endorse Senator Sam Aanestad for Lt. Governor. “Your conservative record resisting Sacramento’s attempts to raise taxes, defending our constitutional freedoms, and believing strongly in economic growth [...]

Tom “Thomas The Tax Engine” Campbell – the Subject of “Analysis” for his lack of Advertising

May 17, 2010

Now – did you see the monstrous, fiscally un-conservative mailer from  Thomas the Tax Engine? So did I, it was cat-pan liner. I cut and pasted some analysis from Team Carly as to why our favorite Marxist Republican is not on the air – anywhere.

Happy Monday -
Over here at Team Carly, while [...]

President's Approval Rating