Archive for Freddie Mac

By Mark Felsenthal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve threw a massive life-line to consumers on Tuesday with two new programs aimed at making it easier for them to obtain loans for homes, cars and on credit cards.

Under the new mortgage program, the Fed will buy up to $100 billion of debt issued by government-sponsored mortgage enterprises Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks. It will also buy up to $500 billion of mortgage securities backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae.

The central bank also launched a $200 billion facility to support consumer finance, including student, auto, and credit card loans and loans backed by the federal Small Business Administration. This will lend to investors who hold securities backed by this debt.

The launch of the two programs lifted investor spirits and drove up the blue chip Dow Jones industrial average more than 100 points, or about 1.3 percent, within minutes of its open.

“One of the big problems we have is that there has been a lack of demand for debt. You have seen the market for securitized debt such as credit cards or student loans dry up completely,” said Scott Brown, chief economist at Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg, Florida.

“Here is the Fed taking a bunch of debt out of the market,” he said. “It should help unblock the credit markets.”

The new mortgage-support facility was intended to strike at the collapsed housing market, the core of the United States’ economic woes.

“This action is being taken to reduce the cost and increase the availability of credit for the purchase of houses, which in turn should support housing markets and foster improved financial conditions more generally,” the Fed said.

Investor appetite for both the debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the mortgage-backed securities they guarantee has dried up since the government seized the companies in September, and the Fed hopes to fill that void.

TAPPING TARP

“They are getting to the heart of the problem, it’s clean, it’s quick, it’s direct,” said Todd Abraham, co-head of government and mortgage bonds at Federated Investors in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. “It’s a good way to bring down mortgage rates.”

Under the consumer-finance facility, the Treasury will help cover any losses the Fed might face by providing $20 billion of credit protection from its $700 billion financial bailout fund, which Congress approved last month.

A Treasury spokeswoman said the $20 billion will come from the remaining unallocated $40 billion in the first tranche of the $700 billion financial rescue fund. That leaves Treasury with $20 billion, and once that is used it must ask Congress for access to the remaining $350 billion in the fund.

The Treasury noted that issuance of asset-backed securities in consumer lending categories such as credit cards, auto loans and student loans had essentially ground to a halt in October. Last year, issuance was roughly $240 billion.

“Continued disruption in the ABS market could further deteriorate credit availability for consumers and increase the prospects for further deterioration in the economy generally,” the Treasury said in a statement.

The Fed’s twin announcements marked the latest in a series of emergency measures by U.S. authorities to try to keep the economy from falling into a deep and prolonged recession. Late Sunday, the government stepped in to prop up the second largest U.S. bank Citigroup.

Most economists say the emergency steps represent a necessary, if ad hoc, response to the greatest financial shock the United States has experienced since the Great Depression.

Some, however, are worried the mounting costs of the measures, which have the potential to reach several trillion dollars, could eventually fuel a troubling inflation.

“It may mean (a) longer-run issue with inflation and inflation concerns,” said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia Securities in Charlotte, North Carolina. “It may be too much of a good thing is a bad thing. We may be overpaying for bad assets.”

Policy-makers, however, have signaled a willingness to do whatever it takes to try to tamp down the risk of a severe recession.

(Additional reporting by David Lawder in Washington and Al Yoon in New York, Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

 

Reuters

Categories : Featured
Comments (3)

This 2006 letter (see below) signed by John McCain and 19 other Senators has surfaced demanding reform of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. It predicts the the doom we are seeing today. Barack Obama’s signature is absent.

This proves the point that McCain was on the right side of the issue when it counted, and that other one was not.

Comments (1)

Categories : Videos
Comments (0)
Sep
30

ACORN and Obama

Posted by: MountainSage | Comments (0)

Throughout this election season I have been concerned by the lack of information on Barack Obama and his lack of achievements. While Obama has talked much about being a community organizer we have gotten few specifics of what he actually did and achieved during that period. Any efforts to pin him down have been decried as unfair or racist. Likewise, his time as an attorney has received little attention other than the fact he at one time defended Tony Rezko…something Obama made light of but which we have found was just a small part of the relationship between Tony Rezko and Obama.

In August we found out that Obama paid $800,000 to a subsidiary of ACORN, Citizens Services, Inc.:

Read More→

Categories : Economy/Energy
Comments (0)

While lawmakers debate the proposed $700 billion plan to rescue the financial system, Warren Buffett, a powerful investor influence is optimistic. He told CNBC that passing a bailout bill was “the right thing” for Congress to do, calling the current crisis an “economic Pearl Harbor.”

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Billionaire Warren Buffett told congressional negotiators that if they can’t agree on a proposed financial bailout, the nation will face “its biggest financial meltdown in American history,” two sources familiar with the talks said.

 Despite the anger emanating from various investors and taxpayers, Buffet believes that the economy is “everybody’s problem,” according to The New York Times.

Buffett said that in the long-run, the government could make money on the transaction.

Buffet’s comments came shortly after he announced he would invest $5 billion in Goldman Sachs. This move indicates that Buffett holds confidence in the struggling economy.

He noted that he never would have made the investment if he didn’t think lawmakers would pass a bailout bill. As to whether his investment was an attempt to convince Congress to favor the bailout, Buffett said that he simply thought Goldman was a sound investment.

Word of Buffett’s omen came as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced “great progress” in reaching a deal on the White House’s proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial system. Buffett, whom Forbes magazine has placed at No. 2 on its 2008 list of richest Americans, was one of several business experts whose opinions were sought, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-North Dakota, told reporters Saturday.

Conrad, who heads the Senate Budget Committee, said he was involved in some of the talks, though he is not on the formal negotiating team, which is made up of Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Missouri; Sen. Judd Gregg, R-New Hampshire; Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Connecticut; and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts.

“I’m not brave enough to try to influence the Congress,” he said.

 

Breaking News:

WASHINGTON —  Congressional leaders and the Bush administration have reached a tentative deal on a bailout of imperiled financial markets that could cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars.

The House could vote on it Sunday and the Senate on Monday. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the accord just after midnight Saturday and said it still has to be put on paper. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson talked of finalizing the deal but added: “I think we’re there.”

The plan would spend up to $700 billion, most of it on buying deeply devalued mortgages from thehousing market’s collapse and other bad loans held by tottering banks and other investors.

The aim is to prevent credit from drying up and causing a meltdown of the U.S. economy.

Your email:  
Subscribe Unsubscribe  

Sep
26

Hope-o-crisy

Posted by: Pagan Power | Comments (0)

Uppity Woman has an awesome video that describes in great detail how we got to this current financial crisis. But that’s Uppity. She always has the good stuff.

I stated in a previous post that I would not take sides in this debate and keeping to my word I will only present the facts. This video is something everyone should see. Please pass it along to your friends and colleagues. Post links to it in your comments. It’s AWESOME!
Read More→

The US Government is going to spend another 700 billion US taxpayer dollars bailing out financial institutions by buying their bad mortgages.

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration asked Congress on Saturday for the power to buy $700 billion in toxic assets clogging the financial system and threatening the economy as negotiations began on the largest bailout since the Great Depression.

The rescue plan would give Washington broad authority to purchase bad mortgage-related assets from U.S. financial institutions for the next two years. It does not specify which institutions qualify or what, if anything, the government would get in return for the unprecedented infusion. source

Basically this means that companies holding mortgages from people who can not make their payments will transfer the bad loans to the US Government, you and me. 

Democrats are pressing to require that the plan help more strapped borrowers stay in their homes and to condition the bailout on new limits on executive compensation.

That means that the people who cannot make their payments, many of whom should never have been loaned the money in the first place will get to stay in their homes. If there is any silver lining, now that Barack Obama’s advisors already got their golden parachutes from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Democrats want to limit future executive excesses.

Folks, we are being sold down the river, again. There should be a Special Prosecutor assigned to investigate any elected officials who stand to make money off this deal.

Comments (0)

It looks like the Palinator has gotten to Obama, at least this week. Republicans are no doubt thinking “our glitzy new person” can beat up your “glitzy new person”. Real Clear Politics has the numbers and the McCain Palin ticket got a big post convention bounce. Gallup has the Republican slate up by 10 points, and that is coming from minus numbers.

The Democrat Convention bounce was more like a thud. When John McCain announced Sarah Palin, the media and the Democrats couldn’t wait to pounce on her and Obama’s acceptance speech was lost in the fray. They jumped too soon, giving Palin the free shot she took in her convention speech, which has ignited the Republican base and put the Democrats on the defensive.

Around the media and the blogs the war of words goes on. Who’s more experienced, who lied rabble rabble rabble, blah blah blah.

When will someone start talking about the issues?

The US is facing a 9 trillion dollar national debt. How can we finish the Iraq war, bail out Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, and continue to deficit spend the way the US Congress likes to? Not to mention the “lock box” that the citizens of America keep their Social Security trust fund in contains IOU’s not cash. The US Government’s accounting gimmicks make the Enron scandal look like shoplifting. This is further compounded by trade deficits for goods and the high cost of foreign oil, which is sucking the life out of the US economy as record amounts of America’s money is ending up in foreign coffers.

And there are those who want to raise taxes, and pay health care costs for under and uninsured Americans. A noble goal but at what cost and to whom?

If one looks at the national debt and the continued overspending by the US government as a whole, lumping in all branches and both parties averaged out, it is not a pretty picture. It should come as no surprise that Congress’s approval rating is 17.3% and though the President’s is higher it is nothing to brag about.

It seems like more than ever the American people are not happy with their government’s poor job performance and are looking for major reforms. Americans want accountability, and a sense that their tax dollars are not going to waste. Will the members of both parties wake up and start putting the American people’s best interest over their party affiliation?

The answer I fear is “rabble rabble rabble, blah blah blah”.

Contributors