This 2006 letter (see below) signed by John McCain and 19 other Senators has surfaced demanding reform of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. It predicts the the doom we are seeing today. Barack Obama’s signature is absent.
This proves the point that McCain was on the right side of the issue when it counted, and that other one was not.
The past ten days has radically shifted the entire course of the Presidential campaigns… but seemingly not in the way that most people have caught on to yet.
From Firedoglake
I can’t think of any way to sugar coat this, I’m afraid. It’s a bad bill and it isn’t just that Barack Obama voted for it, it’s that everything I’m hearing from the Hill says that he’s been actively whipping it, not just in the Senate but in the House. Barack didn’t hold his nose and vote for this, he made it his bill as much as it is Paulson’s.
With this bill go your chances of having, say, universal health care, or massive infrastructure development, or really getting the US of its dependence on foreign oil, or really rebuilding America’s school system—or whatever other big, expensive project you thought Obama was promising….
….And it’s Barack Obama who turned to Nancy Pelosi and Reid and said “this bill must pass”. It’s Obama who is whipping votes and bending arms for this despite the fact that it is massively unpopular. This is Obama’s bill.
….That’s Obama’s first real act as the presumptive President and as the Democratic party’s de-facto leader.
I both agree and disagree with this article.
While I do agree that the bill as passed is less than great, I disagree with the author’s reasoning behind why the bill is so bad. As I have said before, the bill is a necessary evil and is better than not acting at all, but the bill as it was passed was terrible because of all the pork.
I do agree with the author that all of the projects that Obama has promised are dead in the water now.
Obama’s proposed projects would cost the United States $1.2 trillion… and he just signed on to a bill that eats about $815 billion out of the budget. It will be virtually impossible to add anything else of any size to the budget, even for the god-like Barack Obama.
It’s no wonder that Obama is getting really vague about what he is actually still going to accomplish… especially during the debates
LEHRER: All right. All right, speaking of things that both of you want, another lead question, and it has to do with the rescue — the financial rescue thing that we started — started asking about.
And what — and the first answer is to you, Senator Obama. As president, as a result of whatever financial rescue plan comes about and the billion, $700 billion, whatever it is it’s going to cost, what are you going to have to give up, in terms of the priorities that you would bring as president of the United States, as a result of having to pay for the financial rescue plan?
OBAMA: Well, there are a range of things that are probably going to have to be delayed. We don’t yet know what our tax revenues are going to be. The economy is slowing down, so it’s hard to anticipate right now what the budget is going to look like next year.
But there’s no doubt that we’re not going to be able to do everything that I think needs to be done.
Lehrer went on to press Obama even further and Obama got even more avoidant. The sidestepping during the debate was really interesting to watch though.
With those few deft phrases, Obama has basically absolved himself of actually having to deliver on any promises what-so-ever if he becomes President.
As the author from Firedoglake said… say good by to “universal health care, or massive infrastructure development, or really getting the US of its dependence on foreign oil, or really rebuilding America’s school system—or whatever other big, expensive project you thought Obama was promising.”
The fact is that, because of the price tag of the bailout bill, Obama cannot fulfill a single promise he has made and has as much as admitted it.
John McCain on the other hand can still deliver on his promises. He wants to cut spending and increase oversight to stimulate the economy, increase job creation and keep industry honest and on track.
And, so I will leave you with this…
Knowing all of the above… what is your answer to Bill Clinton’s question now?
For example, you’re a voter, and you have Candidate X and Candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything. But you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues, but you believe that, on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver. For whom will you vote?
When Sarah Palin was announced as the VP candidate the left wing blogs and media went so far overboard against her it had the effect of amplifying the effectiveness of her convention speech. This energized the base beyond expectations, and beyond the levels that would have been achieved if she had been treated fairly.
In the weeks leading up to the debate the same pattern was repeated. The Gibson and Couric interviews caused even some conservatives to start wondering. Again she was underestimated, and again the effect of her performance has been amplified.
There is great relief amongst conservatives tonight as Palin turned in a winning performance and eliminated doubts that she can handle herself and the issues. The left has no answer to deal with Sarah. The polls will tilt back towards McCain over the next several days. Rope-A-Dope!
With the election less than two months away the McCain-Palin ticket has surged ahead in the electoral college vote count. With neither ticket at the magic number of 270 and 104 votes still up for grabs, the McCain-Palin ticket has 227 to the Obama-Biden ticket’s 207. The toss up states include Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada. See the whole map here at Real Clear Politics.
In polls the race is tightening as we move further from the conventions with the RCP Average at just +1.3 for McCain. See the Presidential polls here at Real Clear Politics.
The individual polls and the electoral count indicate that McCain and Palin continue to have the advantage but there is no break out by either candidate as election day gets closer. Short of a “big surprise” it looks like we are in for a very close election.
Ageism is illegal, and it’s wrong. But a quick tour around the blogs and the MSM will reveal a torrent of ageism directed at John McCain. A sampling of Obama’s comments contain thinly veiled references to John McCain’s age.
WASHINGTON (CNN) – Is Sen. John McCain too old to be president?
Listen to some Democrats, and you’ll think the 71-year-old Arizona senator is a man lost in a perpetual fog. He is “confused” and has “lost his bearings” or is “out of touch.”
Listen to the McCain campaign, and you’ll be convinced that Democrats are using those terms to exploit concerns that the presumptive Republican nominee is too old to effectively serve as president.
For his part, McCain tends to answer questions about his age with quips such as, “I’m older than dirt and have more scars than Frankenstein, but I’ve learned a few things along the way.”
The first salvo of the general election’s age war may have been launched in May, when Sen. Barack Obama argued in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that McCain had “lost his bearings” while pursuing the Republican nomination.
The McCain camp claimed that Obama’s use of that phrase was “a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain’s age as an issue.” -source
Democratic Operative Takes on McCain’s Age
Despite a recent promise from Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean not to make Sen. John McCain’s age — he turns 72 in August — an issue in the presidential campaign, a senior Democratic operative has started a new website designed to draw attention to just that fact.
Called “Younger than McCain“, the website is being run by Steve Rosenthal, a former political director at the AFL-CIO and executive director of America Coming Together, a massive soft money effort organized around the 2004 presidential race. Rosenthal is now a partner in The Organizing Group.
The "Massive News" theme by: Press75.com
Recent Comments